\n
I think the problems at Spurs go deeper than the coach. But saying that – the decision making at the club has certainly contributed – especially with the choices of coach post Ange.<\/p>\n
Frank inherited a squad built for the front foot, proactive football. We were promised flexibility from Frank after Ange’s mostly myopic approach, but instead we kind of got a non-football under Frank which seemed to leave the players confused. Spurs didn’t really have problems scoring goals under Ange. But that became difficult under Frank – with a focus on set piece play for a team that used to like to press from the front, have possession, play the ball on the floor and dominate games. With Frank Spurs started to launch it long (with a keeper who couldn’t) – and that was the start and downhill from there. Historically bad xG’s occurred game after game, players p\u00f6layed out of position or simply mis profiled. Frank’s tenure was absolutely awful. Injuries played their part (when don’t they at Spurs?) – and the club selling two season’s in a row top scorers who weren’t replaced certainly added bluntness in front of goal to the mix.<\/p>\n
De Zerbi sees players in this Spurs team that can play the game in his style -or at least to his principles . As we’ve seen with West Ham – they are getting out of this mess by trying to win games. Spurs need to be more positive in their intent and they actually have the players to do this. Let’s see if De Zerbi can raise the confidence levels.<\/p>\n
The firing of Ange – after delivering a trophy – and with most of the season having a depleted squad as we have now (for context) – was an achievement. This talk of Spurs getting used to losing is denied by the EL win – an ultimate in winning. There was a sense of togetherness between players, fans and coach after Bilbao. The club decided to end that abruptly and the club hasn’t recovered.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n