\n<\/p>\n
After less than two hours of deliberations, a jury on Monday rejected Elon Musk’s<\/a> claims against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman<\/a>, ending a dramatic chapter in the bitter rivalry between the two tech billionaires, who were once close friends<\/a>. <\/p>\n The court, led by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, agreed with the advisory jury’s determination that Altman and OpenAI were not liable, and that “claims of breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment are dismissed as untimely.” Gonzales Rogers said she was prepared to dismiss Musk’s claims “on the spot.”<\/p>\n The jury found that Musk’s claims were filed outside of the statute of limitations, deciding that Musk had three years to sue and he did not file on time.<\/p>\n “There’s a substantial amount of evidence to support the jury’s finding,” the judge said in wrapping up the three-week trial in Oakland, California. <\/p>\n Addressing Gonzales Rogers, Musk lead counsel Steven Molo reserved his client’s right to appeal. <\/p>\n Musk sued Altman and OpenAI in 2024, alleging they violated their commitment to keep the artificial intelligence lab as a nonprofit. Musk helped start OpenAI in 2015, but left the board three years later.<\/p>\n