{"id":73460,"date":"2025-11-14T09:15:22","date_gmt":"2025-11-14T12:15:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubirataonline.com.br\/ai-slop-tops-billboard-and-spotify-charts-as-synthetic-music-spreads-artificial-intelligence-ai\/"},"modified":"2025-11-14T09:15:22","modified_gmt":"2025-11-14T12:15:22","slug":"ai-slop-tops-billboard-and-spotify-charts-as-synthetic-music-spreads-artificial-intelligence-ai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubirataonline.com.br\/en\/ai-slop-tops-billboard-and-spotify-charts-as-synthetic-music-spreads-artificial-intelligence-ai\/","title":{"rendered":"AI slop tops Billboard and Spotify charts as synthetic music spreads | Artificial intelligence (AI)"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Three songs generated by artificial intelligence<\/a> topped music charts this week, reaching the highest spots on Spotify<\/a> and Billboard charts.<\/p>\n

Walk My Walk and Livin\u2019 on Borrowed Time by the outfit Breaking Rust topped Spotify\u2019s \u201cViral 50\u201d songs in the US, which documents the \u201cmost viral tracks right now\u201d on a daily basis, according to the streaming service. A Dutch song, We Say No, No, No to an Asylum Center, an anti-migrant anthem by JW \u201cBroken Veteran\u201d that protests against the creation of new asylum centers, took the top position in Spotify\u2019s global version of the viral chart around the same time. Breaking Rust also appeared in the top five on the global chart.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou can kick rocks if you don\u2019t like how I talk,\u201d reads a lyric from Walk My Walk, a seeming double entendre challenging those opposed to AI-generated music.<\/p>\n

Days after its ascent up the charts, the Dutch song disappeared from Spotify and YouTube, as did Broken Veteran\u2019s other music. Spotify told the Dutch outlet NU.nl<\/a> that the company had not removed the music, the owners of the song rights had. Broken Veteran told the outlet that he did not know why his music had disappeared and that he was investigating, hoping to return it soon.<\/p>\n

In an email to the Guardian, Broken Veteran, who declined to give his real name, said that he saw AI as \u201cjust another tool for expression, particularly valuable for people like me who have something to say but lack traditional musical training\u201d, adding that the technology had \u201cdemocratized music creation\u201d. He claimed his songs \u201cexpress frustration with governmental policies, not with migrants as individuals\u201d.<\/p>\n

For three weeks, Walk My Walk has led Billboard\u2019s \u201cCountry Digital Song Sales\u201d chart, which measures downloads and digital purchases. The list is minor in comparison to Billboard\u2019s \u201cHot Country Songs\u201d or \u201cTop Country Albums\u201d, which measure a broader range of signals of success. Breaking Rust did not respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n

AI-made music spreads<\/h2>\n

These three songs are part of a flood of AI-generated music that has come to saturate streaming platforms. A study published on Wednesday<\/a> by the streaming app Deezer estimates that 50,000 AI-generated songs are uploaded to the platform every day \u2013 34% of all the music submitted.<\/p>\n

Walk My Walk and We Say No, No, No to an Asylum Center, aren\u2019t the first AI-generated songs to reach a mass audience. Over the summer, AI-generated songs from a group going by the name Velvet Sundown amassed<\/a> over a million streams on Spotify, in what one member later described as an \u201cart hoax\u201d.<\/p>\n

Ed Newton-Rex, a musician and the founder of a non-profit that certifies generative AI companies\u2019 data training practices as fair to artists, says that the sheer number of AI-generated songs now online is a key factor driving the ascent of a few AI-generated hits.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s part of the very rapid trend of AI music gaining in popularity essentially because it\u2019s spreading in volume,\u201d he said. \u201cWhat you have here is 50,000 tracks a day that are competing with human musicians. You have a new, hyperscalable competitor and, moreover, this competitor that was built by exploitation.\u201d<\/p>\n

AI music has improved in quality from its early, clanking days. As part of its study, Deezer surveyed 9,000 people in eight countries and found that 97% could not distinguish between AI-generated music and human-written music.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s no denying it. I think it\u2019s fair to say you can\u2019t distinguish the best AI music from human-composed music now,\u201d Newton-Rex said.<\/p>\n

skip past newsletter promotion<\/a><\/p>\n