{"id":76876,"date":"2025-12-31T04:49:55","date_gmt":"2025-12-31T07:49:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubirataonline.com.br\/marriotts-controversial-new-ban-draws-guest-criticism\/"},"modified":"2025-12-31T04:49:55","modified_gmt":"2025-12-31T07:49:55","slug":"marriotts-controversial-new-ban-draws-guest-criticism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubirataonline.com.br\/en\/marriotts-controversial-new-ban-draws-guest-criticism\/","title":{"rendered":"Marriott\u2019s controversial new ban draws guest criticism"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Marriott International (MAR<\/a>), one of the world\u2019s largest hotel chains, had a year of notable achievements and a few setbacks. The chain behind brands such as The Ritz-Carlton, St. Regis, and JW Marriott operates more than 30 brands and nearly 9,600 properties in 143 countries and territories.<\/p>\n

In 2025, in just one quarter, Marriott added 120 properties and 17,903 rooms, focusing on its asset-light franchising segment, according to analyst Daniel Javier for Seeking Alpha<\/a>. Luxury offerings remained a priority, with 26 new hotels opening in India<\/a> and 1,900 rooms added to its portfolio.<\/p>\n

However, Marriott also faced controversy. In November, the Maasai ethnic group filed a lawsuit<\/a> to demolish a new Ritz-Carlton luxury safari camp, claiming it blocks a key Serengeti wildlife migration route.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, a Fairfield by Marriott posted a sign stating that complimentary bottled water isn\u2019t included, even for elite members, unless they select a \u201cmarket item,\u201d drawing mockery online, according to Veronika Bondarenko of TheStreet<\/a>.<\/p>\n

More recently, Marriott caused guest backlash with a new ban.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"<em>Marriott<\/div>\n<\/div>
Marriott New Orleans drew attention with a sign reserving benches for employees.<\/em>Image source&colon; HWall&sol;Shutterstock <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The New Orleans Marriott Warehouse Arts District caught attention from guests due to a sign saying \u201cBenches are for Marriott employees only.\u201d<\/p>\n

The hotel is located in a 19th-century warehouse, close to the French Quarter,\u00a0 the New Orleans Garden District, and the Central Business District.<\/p>\n

\u201cOur New Orleans hotel in the downtown area enjoys an excellent location across the street from the New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center. Host events from 26,636 square feet of revamped event space and fuel up for the day ahead at our full-service Starbucks,\u201d reads the description on Marriott’s hotel page<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The benches in question are part of the hotel\u2019s common area and are easily accessible by the public, which Marriott appears to prefer the public not use. A sign noting that the benches are for employee-only use is next to \u201cNo Smoking\u201d and \u201cNo Loitering\u201d plastered on the red brick wall, writes The Travel<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Does the sign mean that hotel guests, no matter their status, aren\u2019t welcome to use the benches?<\/p>\n

While the water bottle incident is clear, as the hotel giant plainly states that\u00a0 complimentary bottled water isn\u2019t included unless guests select a \u201cmarket item,\u201d the sign designating benches only for employees is somewhat confusing.<\/p>\n

View from the Wing\u2019s Gary Leff, a recognized expert in miles, points, and business travel, believes that the New Orleans Marriott sign \u201cemployees only\u201d isn\u2019t really about keeping guests out, but instead is meant to prevent loitering, smoking, panhandling, and other security issues near the entrance.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis sign is almost certainly not about guests. It\u2019s in New Orleans. It\u2019s about loitering control. They\u2019re also flagging NO LOITERING and NO SMOKING. That says, we\u2019ve had people hanging out here who aren\u2019t supposed to be here and we want them gone,\u201d writes Leff for View from the Wing<\/a>.<\/p>\n

While the intent was maintaining security and staff space, the sign gives a poor impression of hospitality and might have been handled more tactfully with design changes, such as divided benches or better lighting.<\/p>\n

Leff further notes that the sign is not ideal for either guests or staff, as guests feel like they are not welcomed, and staff get a message along the lines that their breakout area is out on the sidewalk, under a “No Loitering” sign.<\/p>\n

Online readers also weighed in on Marriott\u2019s approach, providing insight into guest perceptions.<\/p>\n

In the comment section of View from the Wing, one reader expressed frustration with the signage, noting it may not deter loitering effectively. While anecdotal, these reactions illustrate how guests perceive the policy.<\/p>\n

User Mantis wrote, \u201c…Now there\u2019s a sign, oh my\u2026that will surely solve the problem.\u201d<\/p>\n

A user with a spontaneous username “This comes to mind” suggested a more precise sign: \u201cFor employees and currently registered guests only.\u201d<\/p>\n

Other guests suggested the hotel could have hired a doorman, while another noted that a sign is less expensive.<\/p>\n

Overall, comments suggest that a world-class hotel brand such as Marriott could have managed the situation more subtly with alternative signage or layout changes.<\/p>\n

While guest reactions to the new policies highlight struggles in hospitality and brand perception, Marriott\u2019s broader business operations in 2025 confirm both resilience and growth. Despite occasional controversies, the hotel giant continues to expand its portfolio, dominate new markets, launch special deals for its loyal members and deliver strong financial results.<\/p>\n