Newsletter Subscribe
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter







Welcome to Baseball America’s latest in-season projection of the 2026 college baseball NCAA Tournament bracket.
In the past, BA utilized our College Baseball Top 25 rankings to determine a projected national seed order. In an effort to avoid large swings, though, this year we are leaning on projection to determine what the field could look like on Selection Monday, rather than present a live snapshot of the current hierarchy.
Additionally, we are now showing our work on the two-seed line due to the NCAA selection committee’s updated seeding format. Beginning this season, the committee will rank the top 32 teams, not just the 16 regional hosts. Seeds 17-32 will be slotted into regionals based on that ranking: teams 29-32 will be paired with the top four national seeds, 25-28 with seeds 5-8, 21-24 with seeds 9-12 and 17-20 with seeds 13-16. The projected bracket below is designed to reflect how that structure will work, even if the committee ultimately does not make its full two-seed rankings public.
The SEC continues to lead our latest projection with 12 total bids followed by the ACC (9), Big 12 (7), Big Ten (5), Conference USA (3), the American (3) and the Sun Belt (2).
Before we get into the latest bracketology, here’s a breakdown of recent results that had postseason implications and factored heavily into our latest bracket. You can also jump right to the new Field of 64 by clicking here.
We’ve been extremely cautious when it comes to projecting a Big 12 host, opting not to do so over the last couple weeks after the committee made clear last year that it would take an overwhelming resume, likely from the league champion, to land above the host line. TCU won 19 conference games and finished the regular season inside the top 18 in RPI and still did not host. That precedent has been instructive.
Then Kansas went into Manhattan and swept rival Kansas State, improving to 17-1 over its last 18, 17-4 in the Big 12, No. 12 in RPI and 12-3 in Quadrant I games. It also controls its own path to the regular-season title with series remaining against Arizona, West Virginia and BYU before the conference tournament.
That resume and path aligned with a host projection and even prompted consideration for a top-eight national seed, which would bring homefield advantage through the first two rounds of the tournament. There has never been a Lawrence Regional. Kansas is in position to change that.
Alabama isn’t making its projection easy. The Crimson Tide have lost three straight weekend series and enter the final stretch at 10-11 in SEC play and 29-16 overall, neither of which cleanly supports a top-16 seed.
But the path is still there. Alabama hosts Vanderbilt this week, travels to South Carolina and closes at home against Ole Miss. It’s not an easy stretch, but it presents a realistic opportunity to add the six or so wins likely needed to secure postseason baseball in Tuscaloosa.
Last year, Alabama was one of three SEC teams to reach 16 conference wins and the only one that did not host. The difference this year is its RPI. Even at a game below .500 in league play, the Crimson Tide sit No. 7 in RPI, a mark that keeps them in position if they reach the necessary win total.
Last week, the Baseball America Field of 64 projection included four Sun Belt teams, the most of any mid-major league. This week, that number is down to two. It’s a sharp shift, but one driven by results.
Louisiana, a bubble team, took two of three from Arkansas State, also on the bubble, while Texas State dropped two of three to Coastal Carolina to fall to 2-9 in Quad I games. As of April 28, Coastal Carolina leads the league at 17-4, four games clear of Southern Miss and App State. Troy sits fourth and remains outside the field, South Alabama is fifth at 11-10 and Texas State, Arkansas State, UL Monroe, Georgia State and Marshall are all tied at 10-11, with Louisiana just behind at 9-12.
There are strong RPIs throughout the league, but the conference records are becoming difficult to overcome. Last year, Troy went 18-12 in Sun Belt play, finished with 39 wins and a top-50 RPI and still missed the Field of 64. None of this year’s bubble teams appear likely to significantly surpass those marks if they even reach them.
The Sun Belt is strong, but that strength is showing up more as parity than tournament volume.
There was significant movement along the two-seed line last week. A few cases stand out:
The Baseball America Field of 64 projection is exactly that, a projection. It is not a snapshot of the field if the season ended today, but an attempt to forecast where things are headed based on likely outcomes. That approach was particularly important in two cases this week:
| Westwood, Calif. | Tallahassee, Fla. | |
| 1. (1) UCLA^* (Big Ten) | 1. (16) Florida State^ (ACC) | |
| 2. (32) Jacksonville State* (CUSA) | 2. (17) Oklahoma (SEC) | |
| 3. Vanderbilt (SEC) | 3. Missouri State (CUSA) | |
| 4. Cal Baptist* (WAC) | 4. North Florida* (ASUN) | |
| Atlanta, Ga | Tuscaloosa, Ala | |
| 1. (2) Georgia Tech^* (ACC) | 1. (15) Alabama^ (SEC) | |
| 2. (31) East Carolina* (AAC) | 2. (18) USC (Big Ten) | |
| 3. Liberty (CUSA) | 3. Oklahoma State (Big 12) | |
| 4. Rider* (MAAC) | 4. Fairleigh Dickinson* (NEC) | |
| Austin, Tex. | Hattiesburg, Miss. | |
| 1. (3) Texas^* (SEC) | 1. (14) Southern Miss^ (Sun Belt) | |
| 2. (30) Virginia (ACC) | 2. (19) Florida (SEC) | |
| 3. Gonzaga* (WCC) | 3. UTSA (AAC) | |
| 4. Lamar* (Southland) | 4. Yale* (Ivy) | |
| Chapel Hill, NC | Oxford, Miss. | |
| 1. (4) North Carolina^ (ACC) | 1. (13) Ole Miss^ (SEC) | |
| 2. (29) Tennessee (SEC) | 2. (20) Boston College (ACC) | |
| 3. Saint Joseph’s* (A10) | 3. UAB (AAC) | |
| 4. Binghamton* (America East) | 4. Oral Roberts* (Summit) | |
| Auburn, Ala. | Lincoln, Neb. | |
| 1. (5) Auburn^ (SEC) | 1. (12) Nebraska^ (Big Ten) | |
| 2. (28) Wake Forest (ACC) | 2. (21) UCF (Big 12) | |
| 3. Mercer* (Southern) | 3. Pittsburgh (ACC) | |
| 4. Bethune-Cookman* (SWAC) | 4. Creighton* (Big East) | |
| College Station, Texas | Starkville, Miss. | |
| 1. (6) Texas A&M^ (SEC) | 1. (11) Mississippi State^ (SEC) | |
| 2. (27) Cincinnati (Big 12) | 2. (22) West Virginia (Big 12) | |
| 3. Virginia Tech (ACC) | 3. Michigan (Big Ten) | |
| 4. Army* (Patriot) | 4. Southeast Missouri State* (OVC) | |
| Athens, Ga. | Corvallis, Ore. | |
| 1. (7) Georgia^ (SEC) | 1. (10) Oregon State^ (Independent) | |
| 2. (26) Miami (ACC) | 2. (23) Arkansas (SEC) | |
| 3. TCU (Big 12) | 3. UC Santa Barbara* (Big West) | |
| 4. Campbell* (CAA) | 4. San Diego State* (Mountain West) | |
| Conway, S.C. | Lawrence, KS. | |
| 1. (8) Coastal Carolina^* (Sun Belt) | 1. (9) Kansas^* (Big 12) | |
| 2. (25) Arizona State (Big 12) | 2. (24) Oregon (Big Ten) | |
| 3. High Point* (Big South) | 3. Miami (OH)* (MAC) | |
| 4. Indiana State* (MVC) | 4. Wright State* (Horizon) |
* denotes automatic bid
^ denotes regional host
Pittsburgh (ACC)
UTSA (AAC)
Virginia Tech (ACC)
Vanderbilt (SEC)
Kentucky (SEC)
Texas State (Sun Belt)
Baylor (Big 12)
NC State (ACC)
Louisiana (Sun Belt)
Kansas State (Big 12)
Purdue (Big Ten)
Troy (Sun Belt)